Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Nomor: 212/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn.Jmb Terhadap Pelaku Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Teknologi Informasi

Ruben Achmad, Supeno Supeno, Muhammad Halik Al Nemeri

Abstract


Defamation (Defamation) is a criminal act of insult (Beleediging) formed by the legislators, both general and specific in nature and is intended to provide protection for legal interests regarding this kind of feeling. The purpose of this study is to understand and analyze the legal considerations of judges in passing decisions on perpetrators of defamation through the media of information technology (Decision Study Number: 212/Pid. Sus/2019/PN.Jmb). To understand and analyze the verdict handed down against the perpetrators of defamation through information technology media (Decision Study Number: 212/Pid. Sus/2019/PN.Jmb) has it reflected justice. The specification of this research is descriptive analytical research. In writing this thesis the author uses the Normative Juridical approach. The legal material in this thesis research was obtained through library research. Based on this consideration it has been proven legally and convincingly that the defendant has committed a crime, then the defendant must be declared guilty and the defendant must be sentenced to a sentence commensurate with his actions which the threat is according to Article 45 paragraph (3) in conjunction with Article 27 paragraph (3) of the Law Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, the perpetrator is threatened with imprisonment for a maximum of 4 (four) years. However, in this case the defendant was sentenced to 8 (eight) months in prison based on decision Number: 212/Pid.Sus/2019/ PN.Jmb dated 9 May 2019. From a sociological perspective, the sentence of the defendant for 8 months is in accordance with the legal actions carried out by the defendant, although from the point of view of the victim it does not guarantee a sense of justice, it is also less preventive for potential perpetrators of other criminal acts of defamation. Because the sentencing felt so light that the value of the usefulness of the decision was felt to be less acceptable. From a philosophical aspect, to guarantee recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and to fulfill just demands in accordance with security and public order considerations in a democratic society, for the realization of quality, integrity and noble human beings. Suggestions put forward that a judge should have a fair decision in his verdict so that the principle of an independent and impartial judiciary that guarantees the equality of every citizen in law runs well.

Keywords


Judge Consideration Analysis, In Imposing Decisions, Defamation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adami Chazawi, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana 2, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2016.

Amiruddin Dan Zainal Asikin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2016.

Andi Hamzah, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2014.

Barda Nawawi Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Kencana, Jakarta, 2012.

Edi Setiadi Dan Kristian, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Dan Sistem Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia, Kencana, Jakarta, 2017

Hanafi Amrani Dan Mahrus Ali, Sistem Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2015.

Heri Tahir, Proses Hukum Yang Adil Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia, Laksbang Pressindo, Yogyakarta, 2014.

Marwan dan Jimmy, Kamus Hukum, Gama Press, Yogyakarta, 2009.

M.Sudradjat Bassar, Tindak-Tindak Pidana Tertentu Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Remadja Karya, Bandung, 2012.

Muladi Dan Dwidja Priyatno, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Kencana, Jakarta, 2014.

Mulyadi, Lilik, Putusan Hakim Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2012.

P.A.F. Lamintang, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Baru, Bandung, 2012

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta, 2017.

Roeslan Saleh, Pikiran-Pikiran Tentang Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 2012.

Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 2015.

Sudarto, Hukum Dan Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 2014.

Tim Pustaka Gama, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Tanpa Tahun.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v15i2.504

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum Published by Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Batanghari Jambi
Adress: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum, Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Jl. Slamet Ryadi, Kec. Telanaipura, Broni-Jambi, Kodepos: 36122, email: legalitas.unbari[at]gmail.com

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.